[personal profile] alexiscartwheel
First off, we have this gem from last week's Washington Post on how today's college students aren't reading the beat poets, and are therefore idiots. Basically. I think it's just yet another round of "kids these days" BS. Today's young adults aren't less involved in radical politics because they like the Twilight books; there are loads of other societal factors effecting that.
What you see at the next revolution is far more likely to be a well-designed Web site than a radical novel or a poem. Not to be a drag, but that's so uncool. For those of us who care about literature and think it still has a lot to offer, it's time to start chanting, "Hell, no! We won't go!"

Well, yes, literature does have plenty to author. But just cause I don't really care for Kerouac doesn't make me dumb. You have your classics, we have ours. Okay?

In better news, the New York Times reports that book sales are up in Europe thanks to the recession. Books make for inexpensive but high quality entertainment. (Even French translations of Twilight. If you couldn't tell, I don't like being judgey about what people read. Even if Twilight is kinda lulzy.)

And in the Guardian, "Librarians are necessarily heroes and warriors - albeit in disguise." I would so love to work at the British Library, even if they have misplaced some of their books. And can I just say that the Guardian has a much better books section than most U.S. papers? (Actually, many U.S. papers are ditching books all together. Sad.)

***

This has nothing to do with books, but the SciFi Channel rebrand? EPIC FAIL. SyFy? Seriously? I like io9's assement: "I mean, it's the same name! Just spelled stupidly!" Do they think people won't notice? For current science fiction fans, it's insulting. And for non-fans, well, what exactly has changed? I like some of the alternate options on io9, like "The Why Isn't Battlestar Galactica On Anymore Channel" or "The Look, Just Fuck Off Geeks, We Don't Want Your Kind Round Here Network."

Date: 2009-03-19 03:28 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] d4ni.livejournal.com
Everyone is all up in arms about the SciFi channel rebranding. I'll agree that it's pretty retarded, but really, what can you expect from the network that shows pro-wrestling alongside the awesomeness of Battlestar Galactica?

It's just another blow to my science fiction fangirliness. How in the nine hells am I going to get my space opera fix once BSG is over?!

Date: 2009-03-19 04:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] alexiscartwheel.livejournal.com
The wrestling is just another example of network mismanagement. It's seems like they're blowing their unique niche. What's so wrong about embracing the fact that there's some really kick-ass science fiction out there?

And I don't know. You could take the opportunity to become a Trekkie, I guess.

Profile

alexiscartwheel: (Default)
Princess Sparklefists

August 2023

S M T W T F S
  12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 02:01 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios